July 22, 2014

Comparing Nest Eggs: How CPP Reform Affects Retirement Choices

May 31, 2012 – Alexandre Laurin, Kevin Milligan and Tammy Schirle

Reforms underway to the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), which impose higher penalties for opting to receive CPP before age 65 and greater rewards for delaying take-up until after 65, were meant to ensure people do not have a strong financial incentive to retire early and take-up CPP at age 60, according to a report from the C.D. Howe Institute.  In “Comparing Nest Eggs: How CPP Reform Affects Retirement Choices,” authors Alexandre Laurin, Kevin Milligan and Tammy Schirle  find that once the interaction of these age-based CPP adjustments with the tax system is taken into account, some lower-income Canadians will still have financial incentive to retire early, because they face penalties if they don’t.

“Overall, the reform is a step in the right direction, and enhances the flexibility of Canadians to work longer without being penalized for their choice,” said co-author Kevin Milligan. “But on an after-tax basis, for Canadians who collect Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) and have no other separate source of income beyond CPP, pension wealth is maximized at age 60, on average, and is reduced from there on.”

For the report go to: http://www.cdhowe.org/pdf/Commentary_352.pdf

Order a hard copy of this research: Comparing Nest Eggs: How CPP Reform Affects Retirement Choices
Buy Report
Share