-A A +A

In the C.D. Howe Institute’s shadow federal budget, released 12 days before Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland delivered the real thing this week, I and my coauthors, Don Drummond and Alexandre Laurin, recommended raising the GST back to seven per cent in 2023. This idea got attention — mostly about how a two-point hike in the GST was too politically painful to be realistic. Over time, though, even in the big-borrowing, low-interest-rate future described in the budget, every dollar spent on programs requires close to 100 cents of revenue. Painful or not, the permanently bigger federal government that this budget anticipates will require Canadians to pay for it.

Since the pandemic struck, the federal government has taken Canada into uncharted fiscal territory. In the fiscal year that ran from April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, Ottawa financed more than half its program expense, not by taxing, but by borrowing. Not only did it spend 50-cent dollars on average, its regular announcements of tens of billions more spending left the impression that marginal program dollars cost nothing at all.

In its economic statement last November, the government penciled in $70 billion to $100 billion in new stimulus with no associated borrowing costs or revenues whatever. Budget 2021 makes that short-term spending concrete and launches a number of ongoing new programs. The government has also signalled fresh initiatives outside the budget framework, notably on the environment. When new programs look like they cost half-price, or even nothing, why not have more of everything?

But if you look ahead only a few years — no further than the budget projections themselves — the arithmetic changes dramatically. Federal revenue per program dollar rises from 50 cents last year to 93 cents by 2024 and 95 cents by 2025. Over time, even the government’s own numbers show we will be paying close to full price for our federal government programs.

How should we raise these revenues? Using the handy rule-of-thumb that every percentage point added to the GST — Ottawa’s broadest and most robust tax — yields about $10 billion in revenue, a two-point hike in the GST would yield about $20 billion annually.

As it happens, that’s the right number to use in looking at the spending prefigured in the federal budget. Looking past the COVID-related income supports, which have a clear justification and should wind down, in the medium-term (the 2023/24 fiscal year) the budget gives us a bottom line about $20 billion worse than what the government predicted in November. Filling that gap would require, as it happens, a two-percentage-point increase in the GST.

The fall statement, moreover, already reflected spending beyond that presented in the government’s past budget, in 2019. Compare the 2021 budget’s projections for 2023/24 with those in the 2019 budget and the bottom line is about $40 billion worse. Filling that gap would require a four-point increase in the GST.

Needless to say, the government is not talking about raising the GST. Budget 2021 instead contains a number of measures to tax digital services and luxury cars and boats — not politically painful but also not likely to raise much revenue. We may also see proposals for hikes in corporate and personal income taxes before long. But eventually the simple reality that the GST is Ottawa’s broadest and most robust tax will reassert itself. If Canadians want a bigger federal government, we have to be ready for some pain. Because, whether sooner or later, we will have to pay for it.

Published in the Financial Post

William Robson is CEO of the C.D. Howe Institute.